Implementation of the Parole Violation Decision Making Instrument (PVDMI)

Implementation of the Parole Violation Decision qualification Instrument (PVDMI)

calcium Lutheran University

Implementation and Analysis of Public Policy

MPPA 595

Sandy Smith

August 13, 2009

This paper depart focus on the Parole Violation Decision qualification Instrument (PVDMI) which is a tool used by the California part of Corrections and Rehabilitations (CDCR), Division of Adult Parole operations (DAPO) and is currently being implemented statewide as a means to bring consistency to the parole violation process. By making the parole repeal process consistent throughout the state; CDCR is expected to save billions is incarceration cost. In evaluating the political platform the following atomic number 18as will be examined: The content of the policy, the actors and institutions involved, the policy guidelines and the instruction execution process.

CDCRs Mission Statement

We put up public rubber eraser through safe and secure incarceration of offenders, effective parole supervision, and rehabilitative strategies to successfully reintegrate offenders into our communities (California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2009, ? 2).

PVDMI is the result of years of reason starting with the 2003 Little Hoover Commissions report to then regulator Gray Davis, titled Back to the Community: Safe and unplumbed Parole Policies.



The commission made the following recommendations:

1. The State should light in better use of the resources currently spent re-incarcerating parole violators and furnish more public safety by developing a range of interventions for failing parolees (Little Hoover Commission, 2003).

   1. Specifically, the State should: Use organise decision-making. The State should establish clear, transparent and binding guidelines for parole revocation to provide consistency and accountability in the revocation process. This could be the first step in implementing a broader range of responses that are cost-effective and protect the public (Little Hoover Commission, 2003).

2. Use alternative sanctions. To promote public safety and parolee reintegration, the State, in cooperation with police chiefs and sheriffs, should develop a...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.