Should criminals convicted of non-violet crimes face jail terms? Through out his commentary, Kevin mentions a hardly a(prenominal) good argumentative points. For example, he strongly feels that no be how heinous the crime may be, the senseless act such(prenominal) as theft is still a violation of the law. For example, he feels deal who break the law should be punished whence and not necessarily be locked-up and behind bars. An new(prenominal) point presented by the author is how United States citizens have to rectify and deport oneself in order to be punished and imprisoned for their wrongdoings. Kevin Carr feels that people should not be restrained and confined behind steel bars.
Despite the previous arguments, another reason Kevin strongly feels that criminals convicted of non-violet crimes should not face jail terms is because it can leave a psychological affect on people who are not a threat or danger to others. In other words, offenders that find themselves incarcerated for a small case such as being a thief, a beggar, or being a violator for parking infractions should not be labeled and baffle in the same classification as people who are convicted of repulsive, despicable, and inhuman types of criminal violence.
The demeanor of the once calm and mischievous individual can change just from their experience of being locked-up with uncontrollable, wild, and berserk people. These are hardened individuals...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.